The draft maps considered during the process will be listed below.
The most detailed way to view each draft map is using the interactive review map.
The link takes you to a website where you can view all of the maps and zoom in and out to see the map details.
The PDF maps linked below show the map and the demographics of each trustee area in each map. Click on the map number to see that PDF file for that map.
Map (click on the number below for a PDF map and demographic profile) |
Notes |
---|---|
No draft maps are drawn yet. | |
Proposed Draft Maps Election Year Sequencing:
State-Mandated Elections Code Section 21130(b)(1) Disclosure:
California Elections Code Section 21130(b)(1) states:
Consistent with the districting body’s existing obligations under the federal Voting Rights Act, the districting body shall determine whether it is possible to create an election district or districts in which a minority group is sufficiently large and geographically compact to constitute a majority in a single-member district, as set forth in Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986), and as interpreted in case law regarding enforcement of the federal Voting Rights Act with respect to redistricting. The districting body shall publish on its redistricting web page, at a minimum, the results of its analysis within seven days of completing the analysis or prior to adopting election district boundaries, whichever occurs first.
Disclosure:
National Demographics Corporation (NDC), on behalf of the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District, has analyzed the District’s demographics and determined that it is not possible to create an election trustee area or trustee areas in which Latinos, African-Americans, Asian-Americans or Native Americans are a sufficiently large and geographically compact population of Citizens of Voting Age Population (CVAP) to constitute a majority of CVAP in one or more single-member districts, as set forth in Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986), and as interpreted in case law regarding enforcement of the federal Voting Rights Act with respect to redistricting.
NDC’s analysis found that even ignoring the all FAIR MAPS Act requirements other than equal population and contiguity it is not possible to draw a trustee area where Non-Hispanic Whites are not a plurality of Citizen Voting Age Population.
State-Mandated Elections Code Section 21130(b)(2) Disclosure:
Elections Code Section 21130(b)(2) states:
If the districting body, consistent with its existing obligations under the federal Voting Rights Act, conducts an analysis to determine whether “racially polarized voting,” as defined in case law regarding enforcement of the federal Voting Rights Act, exists in the local jurisdiction, the districting body shall publish on its redistricting web page, at a minimum, a summary of its analysis and findings within seven days of completing the analysis or prior to adopting election district boundaries, whichever occurs first.
Disclosure:
The districting body has not conducted any such analysis.